XXII
“But it can’t be right, can it?” Kolya felt like someone had just hit him in
the stomach. He looked sadly at his
friend Hans.
“I don’t know Claus. Professor Bohm-Bawerk makes a good
point. Marginalization does kind of
supplant Marx’s labor theory of value, and it answers Smith’s capitalist
question of why water, which is so fundamental, is so much cheaper than
diamonds, which no one needs to live.”
Hans spoke happily with his Russian friend, who spoke German so well,
but he knew this lecture was weighing heavily on his friend’s mind. “Come on friend, let’s go for a walk next to
the palace.”
Kolya nodded but still gave Hans a tepid
look. He guffawed “Yeah next to the palace
because we can’t go in, that’s for the bourgeoisies.” Hans smiled back and grabbed Kolya gently by
the shoulder leading him down the stairs and outside into the crisp autumn
wind.
“Cheer up, Claus, we’ll figure it out.”
“But it’s not just about figuring it
out; I mean what if they are right? What
if the marginal theory is correct and completely defensible? I mean, so far it seems impenetrable. Diamonds are so rare that any change,
regardless of whether it’s an increase or a decrease, has a huge effect on
their value, which means that their rarity is what makes them more valuable
than water, which has nothing to do with usage.
You know what it means! It means
that labor, being one of the most plentiful goods in the world, is also one of
the cheapest and worthless even if it is necessary.” He lifted up his head in despair and saw the blurred
sun shining through the tall English Yews that lined the path leading to the
palace.
“Ok, so maybe methodologically the
theory is right. But Marx wasn’t ever
one to just leave his theory to methodology right? His was a theory that combined philosophy and
history as well, right?” Kolya looked at
his friend and quietly muttered,
“And sociology...” They both looked at the ground and walked in
silence. The soft howl of the wind
reminded Kolya of his Russian home, now thousands of miles away. Kolya looked up and saw the palace walls
coming into view, behind them the sun danced like a golden ferry between the
haze of clouds. Kolya stopped and
grabbed Hans’ wrist frantically gasping.
“I’ve got it! I’ve got it!”
“Haha, well out with it then!” Hans said gaily.
“The problem with the bourgeois class,
at least socially, is that according to Marx we as humans are fundamentally
creative and free beings right? But the
bourgeoisies are distancing themselves step by step from labor itself. They are becoming rentiers, people who are
mere consumers. People who do not create
anything at all, they merely oversee the creation and consume what is created. Smith’s original problem with diamonds and
water was that water was so much more useful than diamonds. He was confused why people would pay more for
a diamond. The same is true for
labor. Even though it is a common good,
it is necessary for a man to be a man.
Labor lends an escape for our creativity. It gives us freedom and as such is a piece of
our human conscience. If we lose it, we
lose our chance at expression, we become a machine that doesn’t act but is only
acted upon. We become the accursed
rentier!” Kolya glanced at his
friend. Hans looked positively elated.
“We’re going to need to write that
down!” He said excitedly. And indeed Bukharin would write it down. It would become his first book and one of the
most popular works in Soviet Russia after the revolution. It became known as “The Economic Theory of the
Leisure Class.” And was a stepping stone
for one of the Soviets greatest thinkers.
No comments:
Post a Comment